Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump’s administration released the “Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance” document detailing its national defense plans, the Washington Post reported. The document outlined how the US can prepare for a potential war with China and defend itself from threats in the “near abroad,” including Greenland and the Panama Canal. It also said that stopping a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan must be prioritized, requiring US military deployments to be reassessed with a greater focus on the Indo-Pacific region.
Although still in draft form, the document signals a significant shift in the Pentagon’s priorities compared with the 2022 National Defense Strategy. It also aligns closely with Trump’s objectives, including a sharp focus on China.
To the public, Trump might seem like an old-school imperialist bent on disrupting the international order with his claims to want to “take over” foreign territory such as the Panama Canal, Greenland and Canada. However, his words were anything but a madman’s rhetoric — they were based on careful calculation and planning.
Greenland has been geopolitically important to the US and NATO allies since the Cold War. The shortest route for Russian missiles targeting the US is over the arctic and Greenland. As a result, Greenland serves as a crucial line of defense against missile threats and submarine activities in the arctic region.
On the issue of the Panama Canal, Trump wrote that “wonderful soldiers of China” were “lovingly, but illegally, operating the Panama Canal.” One of the reasons for this statement was that Panama’s two biggest ports, Cristobal and Balboa — at either end of the canal — have been operated by a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings since 1997. Beijing’s influence over Hong Kong-based companies means it could restrict US naval and commercial ship access in the event of a conflict.
With China stepping up its influence around the globe, it is evident that Trump is fully aware of the dangers that its strategic deployments pose and that he intends to cut off the tentacles of Chinese expansionism. While his “mad” claims have been ratcheting up global tensions, his actions have the goal of deterring Beijing and gaining greater strategic leverage over the semiconductor industry.
On the issue of the Russia-Ukraine war, as the US shifts its focus to defense of the US homeland and the China challenge, Trump would reduce US forces in Europe by having NATO members and European countries shoulder a greater share of their defense burden. Washington is offloading security responsibilities onto its allies to focus on the more pressing issue of China.
In response to the White House document, China launched military drills around Taiwan to deter “Taiwanese independence” forces. With the US tightening the screws, Beijing finds itself running out of allies and has resorted to using Taiwan as its only bargaining chip.
Taiwan is caught between two superpowers, but this painful predicament helps keep it secure. After all, both superpowers know how much is at stake and what launching a war would mean.
However, Taiwanese should not rejoice that the US is making Taiwan a priority, because it probably indicates that the US believes the possibility of an invasion has risen.
The government and the public should unite and bolster the nation’s defense capabilities. With the US and other allies around the world pushing back against communist forces, Taiwanese should stand alongside the democratic front.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on