Elite universities cowering before Trump’s crackdown on free speech continue their history of supporting plutocracy, delivering us into the arms of fascism.

Stomp of Approval – by Mr. Fish.
I was not surprised when Columbia University’s interim president Katrina Armstrong caved to the demands of the Trump administration.
She agreed to ban face masks or face coverings, prohibit protests in academic buildings and create an internal security force of 36 New York City Police officers empowered to “remove individuals from campus and/or arrest them when appropriate.”
She has also surrendered the autonomy of academic departments, as demanded by the Trump administration, by appointing a new senior vice provost to “review” the university’s department of Middle East, South Asian and African Studies and the Center for Palestine Studies.
Elite universities such as Harvard, Princeton, Columbia or Yale, were created to train and perpetuate the plutocracy. They are not and never have been centers of cutting-edge intellectual thought or hospitable to dissidents and radicals.
They cloak themselves in the veneer of moral probity and intellectualism but cravenly serve political and economic power. This is their nature. Don’t expect it to change, even as we fall headlong into authoritarianism.
Armstrong, like most of the heads of our universities, is fruitlessly humiliating herself. She would, I expect, happily make space on her office wall to hang an oversized portrait of the president. But what she does not know and what history has taught us, is that no appeasement is sufficient with autocrats.
She and the rest of the liberal elites, groveling abjectly in an attempt to accommodate their new masters, will be steadily replaced or dominated by buffoonish goons such as those seeded throughout the Trump administration.
The Department of Education has warned 60 colleges and universities that they could face “potential enforcement actions,” if they do not comply with federal civil rights law that protects students from discrimination based on race or nationality, which includes anti-Semitism.
Columbia, stripped of $400 million in federal grants, is desperately trying to restore the funding. I doubt it will work. Those mounting these assaults against universities intend to turn them into indoctrination machines. The so-called campaign against anti-Semitism is simply a cynical tool being used to achieve that end.

A banner hangs from Columbia’s Hamilton Hall after protesters occupied the building, renaming it “Hind’s Hall,” in April 2024. (Wm3214, Wikimedia Commons, CC0 1.0 Universal)
The warning follows an open letter signed by 200 faculty members on Feb. 3 urging Columbia University implement measures to “protect Jewish students.”
Amongst their demands are the removal of Professor Joseph Massad who teaches Modern Arab Politics and Intellectual History at the university and beginning a Title VI investigation against him, that the university adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of anti-Semitism, which conflates criticism of Israel with racism against Jews and the university hire tenured pro-Israel faculty.
These institutions of privilege — I attended Harvard and have taught at Columbia and Princeton — have always been complicit in the crimes of their times.
They did not, until the world around them changed, speak out against the slaughter of Native Americans, the enslavement of Africans, the crushing of labor and socialist organizations at the turn of the twentieth century and the purging of institutions, including the academy, during the Red Scare in the 1920s and 1930s and later the witch hunts under McCarthyism.
They turned on their students protesting the war in Vietnam in the 1960s as viciously as they are turning on them now.
Many of the dregs of the Trump administration are products of these elite academic institutions. I can assure you their children will also attend these schools despite their public denunciations.
Rep. Elise Stefanik, who humiliated in congressional hearings the presidents of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania, graduated from Harvard. Vice President JD Vance graduated from Yale Law School. Trump graduated from the University of Pennsylvania.
Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth went to Princeton University and Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who has ordered a review of grants to universities from his agency over allegations of anti-Semitism — graduated from Harvard.
Professor Katherine Franke, who taught at Columbia Law School for 25 years, recently lost her position at the university for defending Columbia students’ right to protest in favor of a ceasefire of the Israeli slaughter in Gaza and for Columbia University to divest from Israel. She also condemned the spraying of pro-Palestinian protesters on the campus with a toxic chemical that left students hospitalized.
“Part of why I think Colombia was such an easy target — and it’s not just Columbia, I think this is true for Harvard, for Yale, for the elite universities — is that the boards of trustees are no longer made up of people who are involved in education — committed to the educational mission, in some way professionally or otherwise — see themselves as custodians of the special role that the academy plays in a democracy,” she told me.
“Instead, they are hedge fund managers, venture capitalists, corporate lawyers and in our case, arms manufacturers as well.” She went on:
“And they see that responsibility is to protect only the endowment. I often describe Columbia — which is the largest residential landlord in New York City — as a real estate holding operation that has a side hustle of teaching classes. It has evolved over time into just a business that enjoys nonprofit status.
And so when the pressure started here, there were no voices on the boards of trustees to say, “Hey, wait a minute, we have to be the front line of resistance. Or at a minimum, we have to defend our academic mission.”
When I was sitting in my living room watching [former] president Minouche Shafik testify before that House committee… I was upset because they mentioned me, but more importantly, the fact that president Shafik did not even begin to defend Columbia, its faculty, its students, our project, our history of being one of the premier universities in the world.
Instead, she groveled before a bully. And we all know that when you grovel before a bully, it encourages the bully. And that’s exactly what’s happened here up until today, where they’re still negotiating with the Trump administration on terms that the administration has set. And this university, I think, will never be the same if it survives at all.”
You can see my interview with Professor Franke here.
Universities and colleges across the country have shut down free speech and squandered their academic integrity. They have brutalized, arrested, suspended and expelled faculty, administrators and students that decry the genocide.
They have called police to their campuses — in the case of Columbia three times — to arrest students, often charging them with trespassing. Following the lead of their authoritarian masters they subjected students to internal surveillance.
Columbia University, out front on the repression of its students, banned Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace a month after Israel’s genocide in Gaza had begun in November 2023, when both organizations called for a ceasefire, long before the protests and encampments began.
Columbia’s violent suppression of protests and decision to lock down its campus, which is now surrounded by security checkpoints, paved the way for the abduction of Mahmoud Khalil, who was a graduate student at the School of International Public Affairs.
He is a legal permanent resident. He did not commit a crime. But the university administration had already demonized and criminalized Khalil and the other students, many of whom are Jewish, who dared to protest the mass slaughter in Gaza.
The video — shot by his wife on March 8 — of Khalil being taken away by plainclothes federal agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) who did not identify themselves, is a chilling reminder of the secret police abductions I witnessed on the streets of Santiago during the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet.
The law in authoritarian states protects the criminality of the powerful. It revokes due process, basic freedoms and the rights of citizenship. It is an instrument of repression. It is a very small step from the stripping of rights from a legal resident holding a green card to the stripping of rights of any citizen. This is what is coming.
Khalil was ostensibly arrested under the Immigration Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act. It gives the Secretary of State the power to deport foreign nationals if he has “reasonable ground[s] to believe” their presence or activities in the U.S. “would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences.”
It was used to deny entry to the Chilean poet Pablo Neruda, the Colombian writer Gabriel Garcia Márquez and the British author Doris Lessing. It was also used to deport the poet and essayist Margaret Randall and civil rights activist and journalist Claudia Jones.
Senator Patrick McCarran, an open admirer of the Spanish dictator Francisco Franco and a rabid anti-Semite, formulated the act to target not only dissidents and communists, but also Jews. When the law was enacted, it was used to ban Eastern European Jewish Holocaust survivors from entering the U.S. due to their alleged sympathies with the Soviet Union.
“The irony of that is not lost on any of us, that these are laws that are at their core, deeply antis-Semitic, that are now being deployed in the name of protecting Jewish citizens or our foreign policy goals with the state of Israel,” Franke said.
“And that’s the cynicism of this administration. They don’t give a darn that there’s that history. They’re looking for every piece of power that they can get, every law, no matter how ugly that law may be. Even the laws that interned Japanese people during World War Two. I’m sure they would be more than happy to use those at some point.”
James Luther Adams, my mentor at Harvard Divinity School, was in Germany in 1935 and 1936 until he was arrested and deported by the Gestapo. He worked with the underground anti-Nazi church, known as the Confessing Church, led by dissident clergy such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Adams saw how swiftly and cravenly German universities, which like ours were considered some of the best in the world, surrendered to the dictates of fascism and self-destructed.

About 100 people gathered at Philadelphia’s City Hall to demand the release of Mahmoud Khalil and other political prisoners on March 14. (Joe Piette, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
The theologian and philosopher Paul Tillich, a close friend of Adams, was fired from his teaching post and blacklisted ten weeks after the Nazis came to power in January 1933.
Tillich’s book The Socialist Decision was immediately banned by the Nazis. Tillich, a Lutheran pastor, along with the sociologist Karl Mannheim and the philosopher Max Horkheimer, who wrote Eclipse of Reason which examines the rise of authoritarianism, were branded as “enemies of the Reich,” blacklisted and forced into exile.
The 1933 “Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service” saw all Jewish professors dismissed. The vast majority of academics cowered in fear or, as with the case of the philosopher Martin Heidegger, joined the Nazi Party, which saw him appointed as the Rector of Freiburg University.
Adams saw in the Christian Right disturbing similarities with the German Christian Church, which was pro-Nazi. He was the first person I heard refer to the Christian Right as “Christian fascists.”
He also warned us about universities and academics which, if the country fell into authoritarianism, would debase themselves to protect their status and privileges. Few would speak out or defy authority.
“If the Nazis took over America, 60 percent of the Harvard faculty would happily begin their lectures with the Nazi salute,” he quipped.
And this is where we are. None of the liberal institutions, including the universities, the commercial media and the Democratic Party, will defend us.
They will remain supine, hypocritically betray their supposed principles and commitment to democracy or willingly transform themselves into apologists for the regime.
The purges and silencing of our most courageous and accomplished intellectuals, writers, artists and journalists — begun before Trump’s return to the White House — is being expedited.
Resistance will be left to us. Enemies of the state.
Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who was a foreign correspondent for 15 years for The New York Times, where he served as the Middle East bureau chief and Balkan bureau chief for the paper. He previously worked overseas for The Dallas Morning News, The Christian Science Monitor and NPR. He is the host of show “The Chris Hedges Report.”
NOTE TO READERS: There is now no way left for me to continue to write a weekly column for ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show without your help. The walls are closing in, with startling rapidity, on independent journalism, with the elites, including the Democratic Party elites, clamoring for more and more censorship. Please, if you can, sign up at chrishedges.substack.com so I can continue to post my Monday column on ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show, “The Chris Hedges Report.”
This article is from Scheerpost, for which Chris Hedges writes a regular column. Click here to sign up for email alerts.
Views expressed in this interview may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
The ivy league schools have always been nurseries for the elite. And since the elite now control the nation, it should come as no surprise that they don’t tolerate any dissent or protest.
From the “Resistance”:
“We know what a boot looks like
when seen from underneath,
we know the philosophy of boots,
their metaphysic of kicks and ladders.”
(Margaret Atwood) hxxps://kipar.livejournal.com/124606.html?
The cause for the current fiasco Citizens United v FEC Activist SCOTUS 2010 ruing overturning the previous SCOTUS ruling in the case.
The cure for this, reversal of the current ruling or seizing and freezing Tramp and Mucus mutual $billions.
IMHO when the SCOTUS reversed the ruing on the Citizens United v FEC in Jan 2010 no seemed to understand what and where the ruling would lead to. Anyone with half a brain should have known those with the most money would immediately start working to take over the government. Few would have realize how quickly a select few business men would become ‘Super Wealthy Elitist. For years I have referred to them as the SWEATS.
Look around notice anything in particular?
For instance, those in power in DC currently are working very hard to undermine the free speech of the masses. One of which, Elon Musk was ranks #1 $442 billion Mar 27, 2025 – Forbes & #1 $305 billion Mar 16 2025 Bloomburg. The guy has so much money they must not be able to agree on how many billions he has.
What I see tells me money stifles speech. Case in point, when the guy with all the money has very strong authoritarian tendencies and dictates what you must think and what you can and cannot say he uses his greater wealth, i.e. money, to stifle your speech, he silences your power to communicate your opinion.
Proof money is not speech is in this case money stifles speech.
Now 15 years later we have definitive proof a very real difference between what has become two opposing forces.
I suspect we will experience serous issues in D.C., I simply do not see this ending well.
It’s been a long time coming … I remember reading the great Lewis Lapham’s essays in Harper’s in the late 80’s to early 90’s talking about creeping authoritarianism and what he called “a wish for kings” and all that had been coming to fruition over these decades.
Westerners in general and Americans as a subset seem easy to rile up into authoritarianism … as Gorring said, all you have to do seems to be to scare them into thinking their special way of life is under threat and they will authorize any war or hardship (including taking away civil rights that compose the very “way of life” they are ostensibly trying to protect) to make it go away. Liberals, conservatives, it doesn’t seem to matter, though the issues vary.
I use to look forward to Lewis Lapham’s “Notebook” essay in every Harper’s issue. He was the best editor that magazine ever had. Sadly, when he left, the publication went downhill. A shame for the oldest periodical in the country. Lapham’s political insights were some of the best I ever read. His book, “Money and Class in America” was also prescient. Too bad he didn’t have a wider readership.
Agree … it’s hard for a magazine not to go down after losing a once in a lifetime kind of editor (incision and erudition, both at once) like that … but it’s a shame nevertheless.
First they came for the Columbia students. . .
People should realize that Donald Trump is not a person one can make a deal with, in the ordinary understanding of the word “deal.” He has announced that he will repudiate any deal that turns out not to be to his advantage. That’s not what “deal” means in the ordinary understanding. In that understanding, the parties to an agreement commit themselves to certain terms, agreeing to take the risks that go with the agreement. “Commitment” does not fit the profile of the mercurial Trump.