Send in the clowns. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.

Donald Trump is a great uniter, bringing together the most delusional elements of American life. Attacks on his administration’s reactionary turn are, of course, accurate. But it is far wiser to see his cabinet as a crackpot coalition. Served by representatives from the extremist Left and Right, the President appears to reward any idea, no matter its absurdity or origin, as long as it breaks with the exhausted liberal consensus.
Taken together, in fact, I think that the ideas animating Magaworld, though contradicting each other on the surface, represent a distinct societal force — one that divorces the republic from reality, and though years in the making represents a bewildering new retreat from empirical truth. A few years back, Kurt Anderson wrote a book exploring how America has become, to use his eponymous term, a “fantasyland.” I’d go further: it’s clear that the Trump presidency is a fantasyland administration for a fantasyland people, and one with depressing implications for the future of American democracy.
Perhaps the clearest example of Trump’s loony politics is Pete Hegseth. The Secretary of Defense, as the latest case study for America’s obsession with boring redemption-conversion stories, has morphed from a binge-drinking lothario into a fire and brimstone Christian fundamentalist. Forget his toe-curling leaks to journalists: in a series of podcast interviews last year, Hegseth spoke warmly of “sphere sovereignty” — which posits that civil law should defer to the Old Testament, even on matters of women’s rights and homosexuality.
Such theocratic ambitions are central to the dogma of “Christian Reconstructionism” — the same theology that guides Hegseth’s church in Tennessee. Part of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, its founder Douglas Wilson has argued that, in the war for Christian supremacy, women, children, and other civilians are legitimate targets, stating that “the word of God tells Christian soldiers what to do.” Wilson’s rabid form of faith prompts questions as to whether or not Hegseth, a member of his flock, believes that the Geneva Conventions and the US Constitution should dictate military policy — or the ravings of an Idaho preacher.
Certainly, Hegseth extends his apocalyptic worldview to domestic affairs, writing that the Christian Right is in a “holy war” against the “Leftist spectre”. Nor is that the only spot where the far-Right fringe is now at the very heart of government. That’s clear enough around the so-called “unitary executive” theory. Developed by Russell Vought, Trump’s Director of the Office of Management and Budget, it posits that, contrary to centuries of Supreme Court rulings and scholarly interpretation, the US Constitution gives the president complete and exclusive control over anything that falls within the purview of the executive branch of government.
The “unitary executive theory” resides in the same cul-de-sac as the dreams of techno-monarchy that Curtis Yarvin promotes in books and interviews. His belief that democracy is bloated and ineffective, and therefore, in need of replacement from a governing elite, has inspired Peter Thiel — mentor to none other than JD Vance.
Yet amid this unsurprising fear of far-Right influence, the far Left, too, has made its mark. To understand what I mean, look no further RFK Jr. He may have a name and history that many Americans associate with liberalism, but the Secretary of Health and Human Services’s lineage is deceiving. Unlike his father and uncles, he’s a promoter of deranged conspiracy theories, including that HIV does not cause AIDS; that the Covid-19 vaccine was a medical experiment on blacks and Latinos; that Covid itself was engineered to spare Jews and Chinese; and that African Americans have different immune systems than whites, resulting in reduced need for vaccination.
Commentators of the Left typically wonder “what happened” to Kennedy — once a respected environmental lawyer — while those on the Right parade him as a prop for the power of MAGA ideology. The reality is that Kennedy simply represents a faction of the Left that looks at the “medical-industrial complex” with contempt.
Tulsi Gabbard, for her part, has followed a similar trajectory. Once the co-chairperson of the Bernie Sanders campaign, the former Democratic member of Congress and presidential candidate advocates for Trump policies with a convert’s zeal. Yet if she’s dumped her support for universal health care, and abandoned the eradication of fossil fuels in the Honolulu surf, her foreign policy positions have remained consistent. In 2017, Gabbard introduced legislation in Congress to “end our country’s illegal war to overthrow the Syrian government” — and shortly after the bill failed to reach a floor vote flew to Damascus to meet President Assad.
These sympathies extend to the leader who helped Assad drop bombs on the people of Aleppo: Vladimir Putin. In this, Gabbard retains support among the so-called “anti-imperialist” Left, people like Max Blumenthal and Matt Taibbi who blame every geopolitical problem on the United States.
I could go on here — but beyond these varied examples, what does this frantic blend of Left and Right actually signify? I think that vivid phrase “fantasyland” can start to offer an answer. As America’s democracy weakens, it becomes aggressive and epistemologically reckless. There’s no longer any belief that the leading institutions of American society — from major political parties to the mainstream media — refuse to accommodate. Accusations of “elitism,” “snobbery,” or “disrespect” of religious faith await anyone who utters a complaint about hallucinatory fantasies that now pollute every conversation of political importance.
The bipartisan phantasm of the Trump administration signifies the completion of a national transformation, one resulting from this misguided accommodation. And it isn’t as if the former gatekeepers of discourse, especially in the legacy media, didn’t, at least in part, invite their own destruction. The leading newspapers, journals, and television networks, with few exceptions, were wrong about the disastrous war on Iraq. They ignored the warning signs of the 2008 financial crash — even as, long before that, they offered shortsighted reporting on the Vietnam War and the AIDS crisis.
Noam Chomsky famously lambasted the mainstream media for “manufacturing consent”. Yet if it’s clear that elite opinion-making is in desperate need of an overhaul, the anything goes, anything is possible blend of cynicism and gullibility that’s replaced it is even worse.
Consider, if nothing else, how quick mad-as-a-hatter conspiracy theories now spread online. There was the “plandemic” documentary asserting that a cabal of international elites planned the Covid-19 pandemic, even as millions of Republicans believed that Joe Biden “rigged” the election in his favour. All the while, large numbers of Leftists reflexively assumed that the first assassination attempt on Donald Trump’s life was fake. The mentality that propelled Trump to power is, in other words, bipartisan and deeply cultural — rather than merely political. Nearly half of Americans believe in demonic possession, while almost a third believe in astrology, and 57% think that ancient advanced civilisations like Atlantis actually existed.
None of this is totally new. Religious fundamentalism, con artistry, and hateful manias have always troubled the American psyche. The Know-Nothing nativists of the 19th century; McCarthyism and the Lavender Scare of the 20th; and the evergreen quality of End Times preachers all show that there is a bottomless appetite for American absurdity. But what made the inauguration of Donald Trump different was that it marked the first time that the forces of absurdity became the country’s governing force. Discontent with the decadent status quo led not to thoughtful reforms — but a rejection of reality itself.
To be fair, not everyone is happy at Trump’s carnival mix of extremism. Many of his policies, especially his assault of vital social services, have already provoked outrage. Opposition will only grow if the Republicans proceed with their plans to make massive cuts to Medicaid. Yet even if his policies ruin Trump’s presidency, the mindset they represent is here to stay, not least given the poisonous effects of social media. Expect America’s fantasyland to remain open for many years to come.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeNow let’s see all you smarty-pantses make coherent comments on this article!
In the true spirit of British fair play… after you, sir.
I got nothing, man.
I believe the proper plural is “smarties-pants”.
Nothing compares to the misfit crew of the Biden years
Thanks for publishing this Unherd. I think it’s important to publish the delusional rantings of the resistance movement, those condescending pseudo-intellects who think they have it all figured out.
This paragraph perfectly illustrates the cognitive dissonance that has infected the political class in the west today. “But what made the inauguration of Donald Trump different was that it marked the first time that the forces of absurdity became the country’s governing force. Discontent with the decadent status quo led not to thoughtful reforms — but a rejection of reality itself.”
Trump was elected because the political class today is not only gripped by an absurd set of luxury beliefs, but they have implemented a wide range of policies rooted in those beliefs. Open borders, net zero, the Covid response, the trans agenda, safe drug supply for addicts etc are the reasons Trump was elected, and why populists are emerging across the west.
I have no doubt that Trump and his crew have many batshit crazy ideas, but let’s get real about the batshit crazy policies that led to his election.
Hey, remember the “reality-based community”? Whatever happened to those guys? They move to Amsterdam, or…what?
left wing pseudo-intellects
in other words the special kids, that still put the screwdriver in the plug socket and eat their own poop. As always these people have been time after time demostrated to be wrong, wrong, wrong on pretty much everything.
For the life of me, I can’t figure why this or any writer thinks ramped up name calling and endless mockery are impressive or persuasive. How many times must it be said that anyone who insults his adversary is obliged to admit defeat. I ask in all seriousness.
Maybe ask David Renton who thinks his adversaries are “special kids that [sic] put the screwdriver in the plug socket and eat their own poop”?
well they do, i seen videos
The Kennedys were always a mixed bag. JFK and RFK were good (although flawed) individuals, Teddy was a low-life who ran away and left a woman to drown in a crashed car, and RFK Jr is….well…. the author covers it.
JFK was a lightweight playboy who almost caused a nuclear war and got the USA deeply into Vietnam, RFK was a nasty piece of work and acolyte of “Tail Gunner Joe” McCarthy (possibly not a minus point actually), and the father was a crook and associate of gangsters.
Not much mixed about that bag.
The father = Trump’s mate Putin!
When they were good, they were very, very good, and when they were bad they were horrid.
All the broken political hacks have left is character attacks. They’re not even creative. I think I’ve read this identical slanderous narrative in at least 20 publications. When you’re devoid of functional ideas outside of public wealth transfers, you just attack the messengers.
How about this- If you don’t want conspiracies about a “rigged election” how about don’t spend the previous four years complaining about a rigged election and calling your opponents foreign agents. Furthermore, if you’re going to change all the voting rules to permit mail ballot harvesting just months before an election; and you know one party has an urban base that lives in close proximity at a time when public gatherings are limited by law, than you create the obvious appearance of advantage.
Then to take things a step further, one party has a Press Monopoly and suppresses legitimate stories about itself while using that sane Monopoly to relentlessly attack the other in an openly biased manner. This is the same Press that cheered the Defunding of Police
and prohibited normies from even questioning the Lab Leak Theory which by now is a majority opinion. If you can’t see that this created the appearance of an unfair playing field than you aren’t as wise as you think you are.
Btw- You can go down Biden’s cabinet list and through the Progressive Establishment Intelligista and find people infinitely more conspiratorial and absurd than the people listed here. No need to even name them.
Finally, it’s always insightful when a guy rails about how much he bemoans the “extremism” of current Republicans and then finishes by whining about traditional Republican values like believing in God or cutting government.
“You can go down Biden’s cabinet list and through the Progressive Establishment Intelligista and find people infinitely more conspiratorial and absurd than the people listed here. No need to even name them“. Oh. I have no idea who you are talking about. Can you name them?
Biden Cabinet:
• Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg- Claims the American Highway system is racist. “Buttigieg launches $1B pilot to build racial equity in roads.” (Reuters).
• Asst Secretary for HHS Rachel Levine- (Woman of the Year 2022.) “There are some people today suggesting that health equity is ‘woke’ or somehow divisive,” Levine said. “But if we have learned anything from COVID-19, and the opioid crisis as well, it is that health equity is fundamental to public health.” (Universal of Michigan)
• Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland- “Haaland embraces ‘indigenous knowledge’ in confronting historic climate change impacts.” (ABC News)
• Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas- Prevents Texas from setting up fences and buoys on the border and then declares Executive Orders don’t secure the border. Wrong. “Judge allows feds to continue cutting razor wire fencing along Texas-Mexico border; Paxton appeals” (KXAN Austin). “Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas pushed back Sunday on Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s recent remarks that President Joe Biden should use more executive authority to take action on the southern border. “He couldn’t be more wrong,” Mayorkas said of the Republican governor in an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union.”
This is just a cursory glance. I can go on forever but I don’t really care about trashing people. The point is that Gabbard, Kennedy and Hegseth have infinitely more wisdom and common sense than anybody in the Biden Cabinet.
The number #1 creeper freak has to be “Admiral” d**k Levine, who used his position within HHS to push for the removal of age limits for genital surgeries and hormone treatments for vulnerable children.
However, EVERY SINGLE PERSON in Biden’s cabinet knew that the President was mentally incapacitated and unfit to serve, and conspired to cover it up from the American people.
“The point is that Gabbard, Kennedy and Hegseth have infinitely more wisdom and common sense than anybody in the Biden Cabinet.”
Did they tell you that on their Slack channel?
No, I was doing a Land Acknowledgement and the thought came to me in a dream.
Judging by your typical comments I’m not too surprised..
Sticking by your Hegseth comment after the run he’s on? That’s ballsy. And stupid.
Mike Waltz was responsible for the leak.
Your obsession with Hegseth’s drinking is pretty funny though considering you have an alcoholic beverage in your name!
Thanks for that. Great rebuttal and, as a Brit, interesting to have names and background.
I suggest you might want to do your own research. My boy, T Bone, isn’t known for his accuracy or honesty.
Try looking into Hegseth’s drinking and abuse issues. They make for interesting reading and might help explain why he’s been such a clusterf#ck since assuming office.
“T bone isn’t known for his accuracy and honesty.” And you are!
Gave me a smile this evening
the democrats are at record low support (29%) according to a latest CNN poll, whatever slight eccentricities on the right are dwarfed by the complete insanity on the left.
Maybe Atlantis existed or it did’nt (probaly just a greek island without the flying machines) but compared to the left who do not know what a women is, and the harmful consequences of that, or wish to imbed Apartheid into the US legal system, or have constant war,
i think most people will pick the side that knows the difference between reality and the lefts insane alice in wonderland world
So yes the US budget needs to be cut, because they are 35 trillion in debt
The War in ukraine needs to come to an end
They need to secure the border
they need to drop Net Zero
Trump is doing all those things
We in the UK and Europe need to look at that and copy it
Yes quite.
I always found the belief that the correct approach to dealing with teenagers who are bit mixed up about their sexuality was to inject them with hormones and mutilate their genitals rather extreme.
I think putting rapists in women’s prisons because they’ve decided on the way to court that they are, in fact, women, is an extreme, and extremely stupid, thing to do.
I found the COVID era response of essentially imprisoning people in their own homes (lockdown), seizing their assets if they protest (Canadian truckers), or banning people from shops if they refuse to be vaccinated (Austria) to be extreme, and it turns out extremely wrong.
That the BBC and other legacy media outlets acted in unison to suppress criticism, and that new media such as Twitter and Facebook removed dissenting voices, was Soviet-level extremes of censorship.
Mandating that sports teams in Europe go down on one knee, for months and months on end, in memory of a violent American thug who beat women and died of asphyxiation while resisting arrest high on fentanyl was, I think, an extreme, almost insane, response.
So while there are certainly some rum characters getting their hour of power right now, it’s a bit of stretch to imply they are extreme, and their political opponents are not. And whether you style them Left, or Right, they have fresh ideas (some of which may turn out to be bad ones), as opposed to the ridiculous, tired garbage peddled by their opponents and their celebrity buddies so ineffectually in the recent election.
“Trump is doing all those things”. Any evidence of that?
As for our dealings with Ukraine, allowing Russia – one of our enemies – to consume one of our allies doesn’t seem like a productive or worthwhile strategy.
How about Russia fucks off from invading a sovereign nation? Any qualms with that view? Would you prefer Trump to pressure Putin into ending the illegal invasion and slaughter of innocents Ukrainians? Curious what you think.
the left never seem to know what’s good for them, and actually trump is good for them, not in the sense he increase’s their chance of power, but that a society ruled by someone like Trump is more beneficial to them , then one ran by a Harris or Clinton
The Left only exists because Modern society is arranged that gives them the protections, rights, freedoms, the police, the courts. Without those it’s open season, and the left would soon become extinct
There is a reason the White ethnonationalists supported Biden, because they saw under Biden an acceleration of the collapse of the US system, a system thrown into chaos, that would serve their long term aims.
The left are like children, you need to tell them not to play with the fire, you have to say you go play, and let the adults talk.
Trump preserves the system , sure he will change it, but fundamentally you will have the rule of law, the left should be thanking Trump every day, because without someone like him, they really do not have a future
The left are like children, you need to tell them not to play with the fire, you have to say you go play, and let the adults talk.
Yes, and when they don’t get what they want, they scream and smash things.
My current favourite definition of the Left is the people who take the longest to understand anything because they are primarily driven by emotion rather than rationality and logic. The emotional fog eventually clears and there is an a-ha moment (“Hmm, maybe open borders do cause a few problems…”) but by then enormous damage has been done.
Why didn’t you put everything you wanted to say in one comment?
Because, if you had looked properly, you would notice that I had made one comment and replied to two others.
Served by representatives from the extremist Left and Right, the President appears to reward any idea, no matter its absurdity or origin, as long as it breaks with the exhausted liberal consensus…
…which was asking us, among such other things, to accept that men can turn into women just because they say so (who needs biological reality?), that we can have open borders AND social systems, that laissez-faire multiculturalism was a good idea, that we can charge into wars without a strategy or an end game and it will all be OK…I could go on.
Put it this way: the liberals got so crazy and unhinged and intolerant and out of touch that they actually made a government containing Pete Hegseth seem like the sensible thing.
RFK Jr…not a great fan of but the last thing I heard of him he was gunning for bans on Smartphones in schools which I’m 100% for, so no loony points being handed out there for the time being.
Elsewhere in this issue of UnHerd is an article claiming that RFK Jr. wants to ban television drug ads. Suddenly I feel much better toward him. Endless ads showing sunny elders benefiting from whatever drug with an alpha-splat name Big Pharma has dreamed up have nearly drained the will to live out of me.
As much as I dislike Trump and his henchmen, I can’t help but think that the shrill tone of the article is going to look like blood in the water to his supporters. America’s democracy survived four years of Trump already, just as it has survived several atrocious presidents before him. Panicking about authoritarianism just makes the progressives look like they lose their heads in a crisis.
It also survived one atrocious president between Trump’s two periods in office – a president whose cognitive abilities had clearly deteriorated to the point that he was not longer fit to hold the office. To me, leaving him there, and thus leaving the Americans wondering who, actually, was running the country, was actually a constitutional crisis.
The Left wailing about there being a constitutional crisis every time a court steps in to stop or limit something Trump is doing and the administration appeals against it is so absurd. It’s only a constitutional crisis if the Supreme Court issues an order on whatever matter lands before it and the administration disregards it.
They need to calm down.
The psychological defects of the Far Right and Far Left have always been strikingly similar. And they’ve always had more common with each other than the rest of us. They hate that, but it’s so true.
As regards a critical decay in American democracy – I think it’s overblown, for the moment at least. However I do think the History books will record the idiocy of the PAC campaign finance changes coupled with the explosion in social media, smart technologies, hidden algorithms and tech bros concentrations resulted in considerable challenges to the 250 year story of the US and the unique beacon of democracy it represents.
Still the refusal to address why Trump was voted in. That the status quo rotten governance is rejected, and yes, current « elites » at the top have every reason for worry if they reached their position without merit.
As usual, the author is smart, educated, capable of empathy and understanding. But he chooses not to be.
The Democratic Party is heading into oblivion. That it still doesn’t understand that law and order matter speaks volumes about where the majority of its leaders live : isolated pockets of wealth, eyes wide shut, and thoroughly disinterested in the wellbeing and aspirations of their fellow Americans.
Partisan piece here, but far more insightful explaining why so many middle of the road democrats voted for Trump :
https://www.foxnews.com/media/columnist-who-calls-herself-maga-leftist-shares-why-trumps-support-goes-beyond-conservatives
And unless the left and this author can address why they are so afraid of debate and opinion diversity, they are facing oblivion
For that matter, the author cannot spot the obvious : nearly all the current government figureheads were official and outspoken Democratic Party supporters.
La paille dans l’œil de ton voisin et la poutre dans le tien
Revolutionary times share one tragedy in common. No one defends the status quo. But the US constitution, and English common law heritage, really weren’t that bad.
Well I managed six paragraphs before my eyes rolled to the back of my head which I suspect is better than most. Vance has 2028 in the bag if this man speaks for the other side.
You got further than I did.
Well, gee. Thank God UnHerd has finally decided to give the TDS community a platform. They’re always so terribly suppressed in the public conversation.
So, that is what advanced if not terminal TDS looks like. The author conveniently ignores WHY Trump was elected, how a majority of voters rejected the sainted status quo brought to us by the uniparty. There is never introspection with these people, just too-clever-by-half attempts at ad hominem.
Do the absurd ideas of which the author speaks include getting a handle on the colossal wastes of taxpayer money, ending our predilection with non-stop war, leaving the border open for another four years, or no longer pretending that men can be women because they feel like it? Whatever one thinks of Trump, the Dem brand is seriously eroded and hit pieces like this will not change that fact. Political memories are short and the left could well make gains in the mid-terms, history says that is probable, but there is little taste for the same ole, same ole.
I don’t like Trump. I’ve never voted for him. And I think he is a cretin and a blowhard. He attacks everything with a sledgehammer, but this time around, I like some of his policies, so I am in wait and see mode. He will be around for the next four years, and I don’t want to be constantly in a state of panic the whole time like many in the media. If the left took a good hard look at his policies and ignored his behavior, they might agree with him.
If Oren Cass and others are right his policies of high tariffs, devaluation of the dollar and bringing those dollars back into the US could lead to the reindustrialization of the American economy and be the best thing to happen to the America worker since the NLRB. They could also lead to worldwide depression and WWIII, we’ll have to wait and see.
He is pushing the boundaries of the constitution, probably too far, but so far his victims have been Hamas supporters, Venezuelan drug gangs, and big law firms that represent big corporations and assuage their conscious by handling the occasional pro-bono case. Do I care if Boeing’s lawyers have the fear of God put into them. I do not. This could all lead to repression and authoritarianism, we’ll have to wait and see.
I cheer RFK’s war on big pharma and big food and don’t see any downside to it. Some of his kookier ideas are concerning, we’ll have to wait and see.
At least, this is change and hopefully the end of the neo-liberal economics we have been living under since Reagan. Most of the worst fears of the MSM will probably never come to pass or they will, and we’re all screwed, we’ll have to wait and see.
This is one of the most absurd pieces, and lacking in insight, ever published in UnHerd.
Posing as some holier-than-thou critic of both Left and Right, he simply cannot see where the peasantry might have anything resembling a legitimate interest. And their misery is oh-so-necessary as part of a functioning society.
Got some bad news for David. Time to get out of your bubble and actually talk to some of the Unwashed. Though there’s no question Trump has some absurd actors of his own, most Americans believe they have a right to exist, as well as a self-interest. That means not importing busloads of Haitians into their towns, keeping middle-aged-men with wigs out of their daughters’ locker rooms, and not sending their sons to die in foreign wars.
What’s crazy is that it’s gotten to the point where the only thing the commentariat can do is say opposition to these things is unhinged. Stop paying these people.
I can hear the UnHerd rubbish lorry pulling up. Wait, let me see. Instead of tipping bins, they are filling them up!
This is another of Unherd’s for-the-sake-argument articles, this time from an author who is bestt known on Salon.com. He has one good insight here, that RFK is not a ‘reformed’ leftist but was imported into MAGA-world with an unchanged set of viewpoints. Now he pitches anti-science policy to Trumpers, hoping to draw them into the bullshit-industrial complex of the wellness movement.
Really amusing to see the Trump cultists freaking out at any tiny criticism of their fat orange god’s stupidity and cruelty.
We are already seeing his cult unravelling. The Musk/Doge stuff has been shown to be an absurd lie, the courts are blocking Trump at every turn and his ludicrous national security team have been exposed as the morons that I told you they were. Who thought that appointing a violent alcoholic daytime TV presenter as secretary of defense could go wrong?!?!?
The GOP toadies who have betrayed their country and their conscience will be swept away next November. Two years after that Trump will be gone forever and every single one of his executive orders will be reversed by President Newsom.
The great unraveling has already begun, implosion is next
Lots a of big words mangled up with a confusing TDS diatribe.
The only serious question to answer, which IT programme wrote this witless nonsense.
So, people who believe that adolescents should be able to undergo hormone therapy and surgical destruction of their reproductive systems on their own volition, that there are no differences between the sexes in physical abilities, that aliens who commit violent crimes should be protected, that America is nothing more than a slave state, that the COVID vaccines were great successes with zero downsides, and that the government can print and spend money in any amounts, forever, are the sane ones? And, to oppose any of that is to be a fantasist?
Not denying that there are kooks in MAGA-land. But, to quote a recent former President, “C’mon, man!”
I get that UnHerd values a diversity of viewpoints. But just because a viewpoint is “diverse” does not mean it is worth anything. I don’t see you publishing 1000-word pieces on how the Earth is flat, or was created about 6000 years ago. Yet, when it comes to Trump, and I stipulate there are plenty of things to criticize about Trump and some of his followers, you give free rein to the worst excesses of TDS.
Why is Unherd publishing juvenile screeds? Recruiting high school kids?
I enjoyed this article, and reading the comments on it has, once again, confirmed my belief that a large majority of unHerd readers, or at least of those readers who comment on articles, exhibit exactly the sort of herd behaviour that they so condemn in others. Its absolutely valid to point out that MAGA has no monopoly whatsoever on absurd policies, but the author never suggested they had, and meanwhile I don’t see anyone engaging with specific charges, such as the one for instance that Pete Hegseth is manifestly unfit for his current role.
There are without doubt some serious intellects in the current administration – Bessent comes to mind as someone who understands how the world works and has some constructive thoughts on how to address some of the really dangerous imbalances that previous administrations of both stripes have been all too happy to see grow, but the overwhelming desire of MAGA true believers to ‘own the Libs’ at every possible juncture leads them, again and again, into precisely the sort of absurdities this author catalogues.
Well said. Own the Libs = TDS.
Already we see a mess developing in Trump’s policies, and it comes from the internal contradictions.
Trump assures Americans that huge sums will ‘flow in’ from tariffs, as if it were not Americans who will pay these taxes. He will try to offset the impact with income tax cuts, but tax is very low or zero for low earners anyway, so they will simply be saddled with the tariffs, while the tax cuts will benefit the already rich, reinforcing the effects of liberal economics he has criticized so often.
They talk about re-leveraging the banks even as their cuts and tariff threats ramp uncertainty and damage growth. He may well end up ‘being nice’ with tariffs, which will undermine their threat in the future.
Soon he’ll be playing golf full time as Vance prepares for 2028.
Everyone knows that Trump’s package is very inconsistent and contradictory. The real question is why voters backed him in such large numbers: a high risk strategy to break the pattern of elected officials ignoring their electorates.